Toronto
416.860.0003
Bar Admission:
2017
Marla Kuperhause (nee Rosenblatt-Worth) is a civil litigator who specializes in employment law and subrogation.
In the context of employment law, Marla advises both employers and employees on a wide range of issues, including wrongful dismissal, employment contracts, termination negotiations, workplace discrimination, and employee benefits. Known for a balanced approach, Marla ensures that her clients are well-informed, confident in their decisions, and empowered to protect their interests.
In the context of subrogation, Marla assists insurance companies, businesses, and individuals in recovering damages from third parties responsible for causing loss or injury. With a keen understanding of subrogation laws and the intricacies of these claims, Marla is dedicated to helping her clients recover the maximum compensation to which they are entitled.
Marla has conducted countless examinations, mediations, and pre-trials and has appeared before the Small Claims Court, Superior Court of Ontario, Human Rights Tribunal, Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council, and various administrative boards.
Marla takes pride in offering personalized and practical legal solutions and focuses on achieving positive results. She strives to provide clear, strategic, and cost-effective legal advice and is a trusted advocate for clients navigating multifaceted legal matters.
Outside of the office, Marla loves adventure. She has hiked through the Rockies, backpacked through Europe and New Zealand, and paddled through many of Ontario’s provincial park lakes.
An Updated Case Comment: Jung v Cloverdale Mall Inc., et al - 2015 ONSC 2386
MB was successful in defending the various owners and operators of Cloverdale Mall, in the case of Jung v Cloverdale Mall Inc., et al. In the recent decision of Justice Harvison Young, the moving party's motion for leave to appeal the Order of Akhtar, J., was denied and further costs were awarded to MB's clients.
The learned judge indicated that there are two possible branches upon which leave may be granted, both of which involve a two-part test....
Featured Case: Jung v Cloverdale Mall., et. al.
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released the decision Jung v Cloverdale Mall Inc. where McCague Borlack, successfully opposed a summary judgment motion and was awarded costs in the amount of $17,000.
For employers, this case demonstrates the importance of creating clear termination provisions that abide by the ESA.
Can employers still rely on the argument that an employee “waited too long” after a lay-off to advance a constructive dismissal claim?
Can employers rely on the argument that the employee "waited too long" after a lay-off to claim constructive dismissal?