- McCague Borlack on winning side of two cases released by the Supreme Court of Canada this week - Rory Barnable, Howard Borlack, Lorne Honickman and Lisa La Horey, April 19, 2012
- Collett v. Reliance Home Comfort | Szilvasy v. Reliance Home Comfort - Hillel David and Mark Mason, ONSC 6928, December 07, 2011
- Goodyear Canada Inc. v. American International Companies - Doug McInnis and Rory Barnable, Court File No. CV-09-00377269, September 15, 2011
INSURANCE COVERAGE
- Accident Benefits
- Animal Law
- Appeals
- Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation
- Civil Fraud Recovery
- Class Actions
- Commercial & Business Litigation
- Construction Law
- Criminal, Regulatory & Administrative Law
- Debt Collection and Recovery
- Defamation & Reputation Management
- Directors & Officers Liability
- Employment Law
- Energy Law
- Environmental Liability
- Family Law
- General Casualty & Special Risks
- Health, Life & Disability Insurance
- Human Rights, Harassment & Abuse
- Insurance Coverage
- Intellectual Property Litigation
- Landlord and Tenant
- Malpractice & Health Care Litigation
- Marine Law
- Mediation, Arbitration & ADR
- Municipal Liability
- Not For Profit and Charity
- Personal Injury
- Police Services
- Privacy Law & Investigations
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability
- Property Insurance
- Risk Management Services
- Sports, Recreation & Resort Liability
- Subrogation
- Transportation Law
Practice Areas
Our Toronto law firm’s Insurance Coverage Group is recognized as one of the largest and most experienced in Canada. It is composed of a balanced mix of senior, intermediate, and junior lawyers with expertise in the legal issues that arise in virtually all lines of insurance.
Equally important, our lawyers understand the business of insurance and risk management.
We are available to assist with the increasingly complex world of policy drafting and opinion work. We also provide advice and representation in coverage disputes that are in litigation, arbitration, mediation, or other resolution forums.
The services offered by our Insurance Coverage Group to the insurance, brokerage, and risk management community are tailored to match the major elements of a comprehensive coverage risk management program centred on first party and third party insurance products. Details follow:
1. Full Range of Services
The Insurance Coverage Group stays at the forefront of the latest developments and trends in insurance law to provide our clients with the very best of coverage advice and representation. Our services include:
- drafting and modifying policy wordings to fit an Ontario or Canadian context
- coverage analysis of particular policies as applied to particular claims
- assessments of the interaction of various coverages
- representation in actions, applications, arbitrations, and other alternative dispute resolution processes to determine coverage
- selection of appropriate experts and consultants to supplement coverage-related analyses (e.g. accountants, engineers, industry underwriting professionals)
- advice on new jurisprudence, statutory changes, and other legal or industry developments
2. First Party Coverage Issues
First party coverage disputes are usually rooted in divergent, but not necessarily unreasonable, competing views of insurers, policyholders, and/or reinsurers. Brokers and adjusters are frequently caught in the middle. The larger and more complex the loss, the greater the room for disagreement over the application of policy wordings. We have a broad range of experience with the following:
- commercial property and business interruption/time element losses
- subscription conflicts
- boiler & machinery wordings
- priority disputes between property and boiler & machinery carriers
- loss adjustment and appraisal issues
- investigation and evidence preservation for subrogation
- fidelity bond, surety, and crime losses
- personal lines – property
- specialty lines (e.g. e-commerce, product recall, political risk, environmental, construction, etc.)
- health, life, disability lines
3. Third Party Coverage Issues
Typical issues that arise between insurers, policyholders, and/or reinsurers in liability coverage disputes include:
- the duty to defend
- allocation of defence costs and indemnity payments
- trigger of coverage and multi-year “long tail” exposures
- “claims made/reported” versus “occurrence” forms
- “other insurance” issues arising from the same or different primary forms (commercial general liability, errors and omissions, directors’ and officers’ liability)
- single-year and multi-year excess/umbrella layer analysis
- “bad faith” claims handling and resolving “conflict of interest” scenarios
- declaratory proceedings to determine obligations to policyholders or as between insurers on the same risk
- reinsurance or retrocession disputes on treaty or certificate wordings
Members of our Insurance Coverage Group have addressed the above issues in the context of many insurance risks, including:
- commercial/comprehensive general liability
- products liability
- professional liability
- directors’ & officers’ liability
- specialty corporate and commercial liabilities
- personal injury exposures
- motor vehicle liability exposures under auto policies
- homeowner liability
- environmental liability
- wrap-up liability (construction)
4. Multi-Jurisdictional Services
Our Toronto law firm is well positioned to provide legal services on an individual or multiple retainer basis for all elements of a coverage risk management program, whether on behalf of policyholders, brokers, insurers, or reinsurers. We also have the unique advantage of membership in the National Coverage Group of Canadian Litigation Counsel, an affiliation of independent insurance law firms across Canada. This relationship, together with our ties to the Harmonie Group in the U.S. and various European firms, enables us to arrange Canadian, North American, and worldwide coverage services through individual firms or a multi-jurisdictional team to comprehensively address the issues.
As a special service, we are available to serve as co-ordinating counsel to contain the increasing hazards inherent in national and international coverage programs as respects conformity with local laws and uniformity in coverage positions. We are experienced in marshalling integrated advice and representation across borders to ensure consistency in coverage responses and litigation positions.
- Recent Decision: Case Summary: Aweys and Intact Insurance by Tracy Brooks, Published in MB's Accident & Benefits Newsletter, April 15, 2012
- The New Era of Auto Insurance Fraud - Identity Theft and the Health Care Practitioner by Maya Jacob, OBA, Health Matters, Health Law Section, March 31, 2012
- Effective Claims Management: Managing the Legal Journey with Your Counsel , MB Seminar - Effective Claims Management, November 04, 2011
- Effective Claims Management: Ambiguous Policy Wordings and Court Interpretations , Paper for MB Seminar - Effective Claims Management, November 04, 2011
- Case Study: Zurich Insurance Company Ltd. v Ison T.H. Auto Sales Inc , MB Subrogation Newsletter, October 27, 2011
- Clarifying pollution exclusions in commercial insurance policies by Doug McInnis, The Lawyers Weekly, August 18, 2011
- Enough is Enough: When Will Plaintiff’s Case Be Dismissed For Delay by Robert McGlashan, Insurance Law Journal Vol XII No. 3, November 30, 2010
- Ottawa-Carleton Standard Condominium Corporation 687 v ING Novex (1) by Hillel David, MB Insurance Coverage Newsletter, May 31, 2010
- Supreme Court Reconsiders the Meaning of "Accident" , MB Insurance Coverage Newsletter, May 31, 2010
- A Dirt Bike is Considered an Automobile by the Ontario Court of Appeal , MB Transportation Newsletter, January 31, 2010
- Loss transfer regime is applicable even when the accident occurred outside of Ontario, if Ontario insurers are involved by Ruby Tatla, MB Transportation Newsletter, January 31, 2010
- Does the Province of Ontario Owe a Duty of Care When Transporting Accident Victims? by Robert McGlashan, OBA Insurance Law Newsletter Volume 20 no.2, December 31, 2009
- Before You Settle - Lockhard v. Quiroz v. C.A.A. Insurance Co. (Ontario)[1] , MB Transportation Newsletter, December 31, 2009
- The Notional Equivalent of Being “Struck†by an Automobile: Tucci v. Pugliese , MB Transportation Newsletter, December 31, 2009
- General Damages which are exactly $100,000.00 are subject to the statutory deductible: Winckle v. Siodlowski , MB Transportation Newsletter, December 31, 2009
- Claimant can meet one definition of catastrophic impairment but not the other: Pastore v. Aviva , MB Transporation Newsletter, December 31, 2009
- Whether a psychological injury in conjunction with a physical injury can be considered catastrophic: Fourniev v. Coachman by Ruby Tatla, MB Transportation Newsletter, December 31, 2009
- Serial and Independent Concurrent Causes in Insurance Law by Hillel David and Gary Caplan, Advocates Quarterly, August 31, 2009
- SCC Narrows 'Faulty Design' Exclusion by Doug McInnis and Rory Barnable, The Lawyers Weekly, January 15, 2009
416.860.0001 | 130 King Street, West | Suite 2700, P.O. Box 136 | The Exchange Tower | Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1C7



