Toronto
416.860.0003
Bar Admission:
2017
Marla Kuperhause (nee Rosenblatt-Worth) is a civil litigator who specializes in employment law and subrogation.
In the context of employment law, Marla advises both employers and employees on a wide range of issues, including wrongful dismissal, employment contracts, termination negotiations, workplace discrimination, and employee benefits. Known for a balanced approach, Marla ensures that her clients are well-informed, confident in their decisions, and empowered to protect their interests.
In the context of subrogation, Marla assists insurance companies, businesses, and individuals in recovering damages from third parties responsible for causing loss or injury. With a keen understanding of subrogation laws and the intricacies of these claims, Marla is dedicated to helping her clients recover the maximum compensation to which they are entitled.
Marla has conducted countless examinations, mediations, and pre-trials and has appeared before the Small Claims Court, Superior Court of Ontario, Human Rights Tribunal, Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council, and various administrative boards.
Marla takes pride in offering personalized and practical legal solutions and focuses on achieving positive results. She strives to provide clear, strategic, and cost-effective legal advice and is a trusted advocate for clients navigating multifaceted legal matters.
Outside of the office, Marla loves adventure. She has hiked through the Rockies, backpacked through Europe and New Zealand, and paddled through many of Ontario’s provincial park lakes.
MB was successful in defending the various owners and operators of Cloverdale Mall, in the case of Jung v Cloverdale Mall Inc., et al. In the recent decision of Justice Harvison Young, the moving party's motion for leave to appeal the Order of Akhtar, J., was denied and further costs were awarded to MB's clients.
The learned judge indicated that there are two possible branches upon which leave may be granted, both of which involve a two-part test....
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released the decision Jung v Cloverdale Mall Inc. where McCague Borlack, successfully opposed a summary judgment motion and was awarded costs in the amount of $17,000.
In the context of subrogated claims, the Ontario Sale of Goods Act (“SOGA”) gives rise to a potential cause of action that must be considered in order to ensure that all potential defendants are named in the claim. As claims handlers and counsel, it is important to determine whether a party to a sales contract upheld its obligations, namely that the goods sold were fit for the intended purpose and were of merchantable quality.
Subrogation is the process whereby an insurer, after indemnifying its insured, assumes its insured's right to recover damages as against a tortfeaser who is liable for causing the damages. Since the insurer's right to subrogate is derivative, the insurer is subject to the same limitations that the insured would be when seeking recovery from third parties.
Over the last few weeks, the eligibility criteria to qualify for CERB have been criticized for excluding many Canadians....In response to this criticism, Prime Minister Trudeau announced during his public address on April 15, 2020, that new criteria would be enacted.