Disputes over the distribution of estates and the exercise of powers of attorney can be some of the most emotional and expensive legal disputes. Our team of estate and trust advocates is experienced in dealing with these cases and ensuring that we quickly analyze the issues and find a path to a resolution to negate both the costs and emotions. Our goal is to resolve our client’s issues quickly and efficiently, ensuring the best and most expeditious result.
Our clients include individuals and corporations in all types of cases involving estates, trusts and powers of attorney. We also work with executors and estate trustees to help protect them from liability.
As a boutique litigation firm, we have top litigators to represent you if the matter goes to court. As well as litigation, we offer mediation and administration services.
Our services include:
First Published in Advocates Quarterly. This paper addresses whether the same principles regarding the “real and substantial possibility” standard of proof apply to a hypothetical past loss claim as they do to a hypothetical future loss claim, and the interplay between the two standards of proof applicable to hypothetical claims: balance of probabilities for the “but for” causation test, and “real and substantial possibility” for damages.
In order to protect limitation periods, especially in cases where liability is yet to be determined, there is an obligation on counsel to identify, name, and pursue all parties who may be liable to the plaintiff(s). However, as the discovery process begins, parties often become aware that they have added in a party that will bear no liability to the plaintiff(s). Often, parties are able to consent to a dismissal or discontinuance without costs; however, there are cases in which defendant(s) will not go out without costs. In these cases, parties can move for a ruling under Rule 23.05...
You have just been sued for breach of contract by a former business partner.
As you skim through a legal document that sets out a laundry list of your alleged failures and faux pas, a few paragraphs jump out at you. Why does the document make reference to an argument over the design of your company's logo? And why is there commentary on the not-so-secret office romance between two of your employees? As far as you can tell, neither of these issues have anything to do with the contract in dispute.